|
16.
Administration of Subagreements
|
|
Basic
Concepts
|
Sponsored
research awards made to the University of Rochester
(UR) are generally conducted within the physical
boundaries of the UR. In the last few years, as federal
agencies have emphasized collaborative research,
it has become increasingly more common for the UR
to engage outside entities to participate in its
research activities. Therefore on occasion, substantive
programmatic work may be parceled out to one
or several institution(s) that are made responsible
for a discrete part of a project awarded to the UR.
|
| These activities
constitute a significant portion of the research
program and require the leadership and direction
of a responsible investigator located at the
work site of the cooperating institution. The
third parties providing the substantive work
are referred to as subrecipients. |
How
is a Subrecipient
Different from a Vendor? |
|
The
most commonly used subagreements at the University
of Rochester are those that are awarded under federal
assistance grants.
|
| The UR uses
the federally-endorsed FDP Model Subaward for
these situations as the flow-down requirements
are clearly delineated and the standard terms/wording
facilitate the subaward negotiation. |
Overview
of the
FDP Model Subaward |
|
However, case-by-case revisions
to the standard wording may be necessary depending
upon the terms and conditions negotiated with the UR's
prime sponsor and upon the subrecipient organization
(e.g., terms for a commercial organization will normally
differ from terms to a non-profit, educational institution.)
|
There
are primarily two documents associated with UR
subagreements for sponsors other than those issued
from federal assistance awards (e.g., commecial
entities). These are the G-Purchase Order and
the Terms and Conditions documents.
|
Overview
of the
G-Purchase Order |
|
Proposal Stage |
The proposal
submitted by the subrecipient candidate includes, at
a minimum, the statement of work, the project budget,
and the written evidence that an authorized organizational
official has endorsed the subrecipient's proposal.
Additional documents might include a resoruces/facilities
page, checklist page, biosketch, other support, and
a signed face page.
It is the responsibility
of the UR principal investigator (PI) to discuss and
negotiate the scope of work to be performed by the
subrecipient. The subrecipient submits a statement
of work or subagreement proposal that outlines the
procedures and methods to be employed in accordance
with the goals of the project proposed by the UR PI.
The statement of work should be submitted to the UR
PI well in advance of the agency deadline to allow
for review and negotiation. If the subagreement involves
human or animal work, appropriate subrecipient approvals
should be included in the proposal if required at the
time of proposal.
A budget is also submitted
by the proposed subrecipient. It is also the responsibility
of the UR PI to evaluate the proposed budget for cost
and price reasonableness against the proposed statement
of work. The subcontracting institution's designated
business representative who is authorized to commit
the institution's resources should sign the subagreement
proposal.
Subcontract proposals
submitted in response to a federal procurement services
request (e.g., a contract) will have additional requirements
at the proposal stage such as additional information
and forms. The UR PI and ORPA Research Administrator
should review the Request for Proposal (RFP) or Request
for Quote (RFQ) carefully to identify the existence
of any additional requirements (for example, completed
Representations and Certifications).
Subcontractor costs are
included in the UR budget as a direct cost to the UR.
UR will assess indirects on the first $25,000 of each
subcontract on all new awards, including competing
renewal grants. Each new project period will generate
a new account and subaward PO number and once again,
the assessment of the UR indirects on the first $25,000
of each subcontract. For projects that require a new
account and a new PO number on an annual basis, the
UR will not assess indirects on the first $25,000 each
year if the accounts are all part of the same project
period.
Subcontracts
budgeted on awards that assess UR F&A on a Total Direct
Cost (TDC) basis (e.g. industry or foundation awards)
are subject to UR F&A on the full amount of the
subaward, not just on the first $25,000. Any waiver
of the UR F&A costs on the subagreement costs requires
the approval of the appropriate Dean's office.
|
| Time
of Award Considerations |
The UR
department or unit is responsible for ensuring that
assurances, such as IRB approval if required, from
the subrecipient have been obtained and forwarded to
ORPA RA. In addition, other UR Compliance Offices (such
as RSRB or UCAR) may be required to review the protocol
and provide approval or a secondary review of those
approvals or assurances.
When the UR receives its
prime award from the sponsoring agency, it is necessary
to establish a subagreement with the subcontracting
institution. ORPA prepares the subagreement documents,
but needs to receive verification and approval from
the PI to release the subagreement. ORPA also requires
verification that the PI has evaluated the subrecipient's
cost proposal. This is done via a Request
to Issue a Subcontract form, ORPA Form No. 122
(see http://www.rochester.edu/ORPA/Forms/reqsub.pdf).
This request must be completed for the first year only.
There
is a different standard for cost review for subcontracts
issued from federal contract awards, which are subject
to both the procurement standards or OMB Circular
A-110 and the Federal Acquisition Regulations. As
such, these subcontractors are subject to the standards
of "open and free competition" and
sole sorce justification and documentation. Even if
the approved technical and cost proposal identifies
the subrecipient, do not take it for granted that the
agency will not require additional action in order
to issue the subcontract. |
The
subrecipient agreement serves a the legal, binding
document that states the rights and responsibilities
of both parties; protects the interest of the sponsor
and the prime recipient and "flows-down" all
necessary requirements, certifications, and assurances
required by the sponsor, and demonstrates to the
sponsor that the prime recipient (UR) has acted
on its behalf and is demonstrating proper stewardship.
|
Common
Elements of a Subagreement |
|
|
| Post-Award
Considerations |
|
Monitoring
As prime grantee, the
UR bears the ultimate responsibility for the conduct
and completion of a project and has a responsibility
to monitor the subrecipient's financial and technical
progress. The PI is integral to the University's fulfillment
of its monitoring responsibility. Specifically, the
PI can fulfill the monitoring needs through:
- Financial
reports review in conjunction with approval of
the subrecipient's periodic invoices (the content
and timeliness of on-going expenditure reports
or invoices is a good indicator of the subrecipient's
grant management system);
- Performance reporting (annual progress
reports should provide information on any deviation
or delay in the agreed upon scope of work);
- Ongoing, documented correspondence
between the investigators; and
- Site visits
(as a means of verifying information when PI conducts
a collaborative visit).
|
Contract Modifications
and Early Termination
Normally, the terms and conditions
for a subagreement remain fixed for the duration
of the project period. Changes to the subagreement
(such as time extension or additional funds) are
implemented through issuance of a Change Order or
Amendment.
Early termination of a subrecipient
agreement may occur for a number of reasons, all
of which may be problematic. Among the reasons for
early termination are (1) failure of the subrecipient
to perform; (2) relocation or illness of the subrecipient's
principal investigator; or (3) termination by the
project's sponsor.
UR and the subrecipient agreement
must authorize early termination and specify the
conditions. Whith regard to failure to perform, the
UR's principal investigator and/or ORPA should have
been documenting lack of progress by the subrecipient
and recorded communications with and efforts to correct
the situation. Even with ample documentation and
clearly defined terms, this decision should be made
carefully. Other solutions should be considered as
well, such as requesting the sponsor to extend the
project to allow for sufficient progress.
If the sponsor terminates the
project, the UR has the responsibility to represent
the subrecipient's interests towards a fair and orderly
closeout and settlement. The subagreement provisions
should allow for payment of all non-cancelable costs,
if applicable, prior to the date of termination,
if this is consistent with the prime award. In early
termination, the sponsor usually still requires the
submission of all reports. |
|
Close-out Procedures
for Grants and Contracts (does not include industry-sponsored
clinical trials)
Before a subawardee's final invoice
can be paid, the UR PI must certify that all technical
reports and/or deliverables have been received and that
the subrecipient has fulfilled its obligations. Depending
on who the prime sponsor is, the subrecipient might also
have to provide additional documentation, such as intellectual
property or property reports.
|
|
| Navigation
Tools |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|