Misconduct
and Reporting
|
Research
is a human enterprise. Scientists are susceptible to human
error and may certainly engage in differences of opinion
about interpretations or judgments of data. Researchers
also work under difficult constraints, such that publication
pressures, limited resources and other contingencies can
push against the desire to maximize quality.
|
|
|
Beyond human error or negligence, there are also errors
that involve deliberate deception. Scientific misconduct
is defined as "fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism
in performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting
research results." |
|
|
At the heart of discussion on these topics is concern
about ethical responsibilities and reporting requirements.
Integrity and conscience demand not only personal adherence
to ethical standards, but reporting of suspected violations
of those standards. Responsibilities in this regard are
codified in three separate policies at UR, i.e, in the
policy
on Scientific
Misconduct, the University's
Code of Conduct,
and in the Medical Center's
Code
of Conduct.
|
|
|
Where
reporting with a School structure is difficult, perceived
violations of laws, regulations or grant/contract terms
may be reported to the Director of University Audit,
Medical Center Compliance Office or the General Counsel.
Reports may be made confidentially, or even anonymously.
Any report (whether from the Medical Center or River Campus)
may also be made on the Strong Health Integrity Line
at 756-8888. Reporting such concerns in good faith is
a service to the University and to the larger academic
community, and will not jeopardize anyone's employment. |
| |