|
Download PDF Version
I. The comprehensive exam serves the following purposes:
- It provides evidence that the student has the prerequisites
necessary to undertake successfully the independent work
required for the dissertation project. (See criteria for
evaluating the comprehensive examination.) Successful completion
of the comprehensive examination is a necessary requirement
for advancement to the writing of the dissertation.
- The comprehensive exam also serves as a transitional
step toward the dissertation.
II. Prerequisites to the Comprehensive Examination
The comprehensive examination may only be undertaken after
the student has completed the Portfolio Evaluation and most course work (Course work officially listed as part of the dissertation
in the individual student’s program of study need not
be completed prior to undertaking the comprehensive examination).
III. Components of the Comprehensive Examination
The comprehensive examination consists of three papers
which meet the following general requirements:
- Each paper shall be a maximum of 25 pages (exclusive
of bibliography and notes). Only with the express permission
of the student’s comprehensive examination committee
may a paper exceed 25 pages. The paper will follow an appropriate
style manual, e.g. APA, MLA, or Chicago Style.
- One paper will address the field which the student anticipates
will be the field in which he/she will be writing the dissertation.
The paper may take either of the following forms: (a) It
may be a synthetic, analytical and critical literature review
of a topic within the student’s primary field of interest;
or (b) the paper may be an expository or argumentative essay
that deals with a problem within the student’s field.
- One paper will focus on the methodological approach the
student anticipates he/she will use in the dissertation.
The paper will include (a) a discussion of the appropriate
use of the relevant methodology; (b) the limitations of
the methodology; and (c) will specifically comment upon,
analyze and critique specific uses of the methodology found
in other relevant research.
- A third paper will demonstrate the student’s familiarity
and expertise in a second field, i.e. a field other than
the field addressed by the papers noted in (2) and (3).
This paper may take the form of: (a) a synthetic, analytical
and critical literature review of a topic within this second
field; (b) the paper may be an expository or argumentative
essay that deals with a problem within this field; or (c)
the student may meet this requirement by developing an annotated
syllabus for a three-credit course with approximately 38
hours of class time spread over fourteen weeks.
- As discussed more fully below, students must complete
each question within two months (for a total of 6 months
of writing time).
IV. Planning Process
It is the student’s responsibility to form his or
her comprehensive exam committee in consultation with his
or her advisor and the chair of the comprehensive exam committee,
if the chair is not the advisor.
The examination committee is composed of three faculty members.
At least two of the three committee members must be tenure-track or clinical Warner School faculty members. One
of those faculty members must be from the student’s
program area, and the other must be from outside the program
area. The third committee member may be a faculty member from
the Warner School, but also may be a faculty member from another
school/college in the University.
The student and the committee must reach an agreement, within
the parameters listed above, regarding the topic/question
of each of the three papers. It is the student’s responsibility
to take the initiative in proposing to the committee the topic/question
of the three papers. A student may consult with the chair
of the committee in formulating this proposal, but the chair
is to serve only as advisor and consultant, with the responsibility
remaining the student’s to develop the specifications
for the three papers. The student may only proceed with work
on the papers after all three members of the committee have
agreed to the papers.
The student and committee will agree on the style, e.g. APA,
to be followed in writing the papers.
The student must complete and submit the Warner School Comprehensive
Examination Form with all required signatures. The form is
best submitted to the Associate Dean of Graduate Studies only after
the student and committee have agreed upon the questions upon
which the student will be examined.
The committee and student will agree upon the sequence in
which the papers will be written.
The committee and student will agree upon which faculty member
shall be the initial reader of a given paper.
From the time of submittal of the required form the student
has one year to complete the comprehensive examination. Thus
within that year-long period a doctoral student (Ed.D. and
Ph.D.) must select, with the committee’s approval, the
three two-month terms in which s/he will write (see III.5.)
s/he will write the three papers. For example, March-April
may be used for one question; July-August may be used for
another question; and October-November for a third question.
Consequently a student and committee following this hypothetical
schedule will agree that the first paper is due at the end
of April, the second at the end of August, and the third at
the end of November. This decision will be made at the time
of the finalization of the entire plan and prior to the filing
of the Warner School Comprehensive Examination Form. Adjustments
in this schedule may only be made with the consent of the
comprehensive exam committee.
Only because of the most unusual and compelling exigencies,
e.g. health problems certified to by a physician, may a student
be granted, with permission of the committee, an extension
regarding either the overall limitation of one year to complete
the entire exam or an extension regarding any of the one/two
month terms allotted to write a particular question.
V. Writing the Papers
While the comprehensive exam plan is being formulated,
committee members may assist the student by providing suggestions
regarding the writing of the paper, such as literature to
review, etc. But the faculty will not consult or advise the
student during the writing of the papers. The comprehensive
examination is intended to be a demonstration of the student’s
capacity to undertake the independent work needed to successfully
complete a dissertation. Note: The Associate Dean of Graduate Studies makes the
final determination regarding extension of the one year time
limit for completing the entire comprehensive exam.
VI. The Grading Process
The assigned reader of a paper will make the initial determination
of whether the paper is a “pass” or “fail.”
If the paper is deemed a failure, the paper will be read by
the other two members of the comprehensive examination committee.
In the circumstance that the whole committee reads a given
paper, a majority vote of the committee will determine if
the paper is to be given a grade of “pass” or
“fail.”
The reading of the papers will commence as the papers are
completed and turned into the relevant faculty reader.
If the paper is given a “pass,” the faculty may
still wish to provide the student with an assessment of the
strengths and weaknesses of the paper.
If the paper is given a failing grade, the faculty will provide
the student with an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses
of the paper.
A student may re-write a failed paper once. Again the student
must designate with the consent of the committee the two-month
term to be devoted to the writing of the paper. Failure of
a paper does NOT extend the over-all one-year limitation for
completion of the comprehensive examination.
In evaluating the papers the faculty will take into consideration
the following factors:
a. The significance of the topic/field/question addressed.
b. The quality of the writing (grammar, syntax, etc.)
c. The correct use of the relevant style manual.
d. Clarity and precision of expression.
e. The organization of the paper.
f. The validity and soundness of an argument.
g. The student’s ability to marshal, analyze, and interpret
relevant evidence.
h. The range and appropriate selection of references.
i. The originality of insights and analysis.
j. In the case of a literature review:
a) Comprehension of the review.
b) Whether the review is synthetic, analytical and critical.
c) Whether the studies are appropriately grouped and related
to each other.
VII. Successful Completion of the Comprehensive Examination
To successfully complete the comprehensive examination
the student must pass all three questions within the one-year
time limit noted earlier.
October 28, 2003
|
