Please consider downloading the latest version of Internet Explorer
to experience this site as intended.
Skip to content

In Review

HUMANITIESThe ‘Ordinary Human Being’ Is in the Details Art historian William Wallace looks beyond the mythic Michelangelo. By Kathleen McGarvey
michelangeloPERPETUAL BLOOMER: Michelangelo (above, in a portrait by Daniele da Volterra) rose to fame with such early works as his painting of the Sistine Chapel ceiling. But his late architectural career, of which St. Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican was just as extraordinary, says scholar William Wallace. (Photo: Fineart/Alamy)

In his lifetime, artist Michelangelo Buonarroti was popularly known as “Il Divino”—“The Divine One.” The immensity of his talent seemed to put him beyond human categories.

But renowned Michelangelo expert William Wallace has spent his career trying to dispel that idea. Even artists of Michelangelo’s caliber “are ordinary human beings who are dealing with fundamentally day-to-day problems,” he says.

The Barbara Murphy Bryant Distinguished Professor of Art History at Washington University in St. Louis, Wallace was this year’s keynote speaker for the Ferrari Humanities Symposia. The series was established in 2012 by University Trustee Bernard Ferrari ’70, ’74M (MD) and his wife, Linda Gaddis Ferrari.

Wallace has been aided in his scholarly quest by the exceptional written record Michelangelo left. “We know more about Michelangelo than probably any artist before the 18th or 19th century,” he says. A tireless correspondent, Michelangelo also worked frequently in official capacities, enmeshed in the Italian Renaissance’s bureaucracy. “And bureaucracies keep records,” says Wallace.

In books such as Michelangelo: The Artist, the Man and His Times (Cambridge University Press, 2010), Wallace show readers the renowned artist as he was in daily life. His latest research, for a book not yet published, examines Michelangelo in his final decades.

While some other long-lived artists are known for distinct early- and late-career styles, Wallace says that’s not the case with Michelangelo. “It’s not so much his artistic style that changes—it’s the kind of projects that he wants to undertake and carry out. His early career is fundamentally concentrated on heroic, large single-figure works that make his reputation: the Pietà, the David, the Sistine Chapel ceiling. These are the things that astonished the world and that he could claim he made entirely by himself. But his late career has very little of that. Instead, he devotes himself to these huge architectural projects that he knows he’s never going to live to finish.”

Researching the artist’s architectural work on St. Peter’s Basilica leads Wallace back, as ever, to the person behind the masterpiece: in this case, Michelangelo in his 80s.

“He was busier than ever, and more creative than ever,” he says.

—Kathleen McGarvey