{"id":289646,"date":"2012-03-23T14:00:00","date_gmt":"2012-03-23T14:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wdev.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent-dev\/2012\/03\/23\/demolishing-nisard-by-eric-chevillard-25-days-of-the-btba\/"},"modified":"2018-04-16T14:39:33","modified_gmt":"2018-04-16T14:39:33","slug":"demolishing-nisard-by-eric-chevillard-25-days-of-the-btba","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/2012\/03\/23\/demolishing-nisard-by-eric-chevillard-25-days-of-the-btba\/","title":{"rendered":""Demolishing Nisard" by Eric Chevillard [25 Days of the BTBA]"},"content":{"rendered":"

As with years past, we’re going to spend the next three weeks highlighting the rest of the 25 titles on the BTBA<\/span> fiction longlist.<\/a> We’ll have a variety of guests writing these posts, all of which are centered around the question of “Why This Book Should Win.” Hopefully these are funny, accidental, entertaining, and informative posts that prompt you to read at least a few of these excellent works.<\/em><\/p>\n

Click here<\/a> for all past and future posts in this series.<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/center><\/p>\n

Demolishing Nisard<\/em><\/a> by Eric Chevillard, translated by Jordan Stump<\/p>\n

Language:<\/b> French
\nCountry:<\/b> France
\nPublisher:<\/b> Dalkey Archive Press<\/p>\n

Why this book should win:<\/b> The pleasure-to-page-count ratio. Because Dalkey Archive is overdue. Because if this book doesn\u2019t win, it\u2019s a victory for Nisard.<\/p>\n

Today\u2019s piece is by Eric Lundgren, a graduate of the Writing Program at Washington University in St. Louis and the author of the chapbook<\/i> The Bystanders (All Along Press).<\/i><\/p>\n

Demolishing Nisard<\/em> asks us to believe that a literary critic poses a grave threat to our world. It\u2019s a rich premise. Who is D\u00e9sir\u00e9 Nisard? A notorious bore, pedant, and careerist, author of a fusty four-volume history of French literature, sporting muttonchop whiskers and an Academie Fran\u00e7aise robe. Oh yeah, and he has been dead for over a century. An unlikely enemy to say the least, but Eric Chevillard\u2019s seductive narrator will quickly convert you to his cause.<\/p>\n

I want to call this book something other than a novel. Chevillard uses the term \u201cbroadside,\u201d which just about does justice to its sustained antagonism. There\u2019s a plot of sorts (the narrator\u2019s hunt for Nisard\u2019s suppressed and saucy-sounding fiction A Milkmaid Succumbs<\/em>) but Chevillard isn\u2019t all that invested in conventional storytelling. This book is anchored in voice and style. It doesn\u2019t so much develop as intensify, gathering complication and depth along the way. Fans of books that relentlessly pursue their subjects, like U and I<\/em> or The Loser<\/em>, will feel right at home here.<\/p>\n

Instead of the careful embroidery of well-made fiction, Demolishing Nisard<\/em> offers rough edges of trash talk raised to an art. It\u2019s tempting to quote whole reams of Jordan Stump\u2019s translation. Do I choose the part where the narrator laments Nisard\u2019s facial hair, because it doesn\u2019t cover enough of his face? The catalog of suggested assaults, which includes \u201cspray herbicide on his golf course\u201d? The beautiful passage in praise of birds, because they carry feathers (i.e. pen quills) away from Nisard? Chevillard is a master stylist and he writes coiled, serpentine sentences that unfold at just the right heat and pace. In English lit you have to reach back to Pope or Swift to find invective of this quality:<\/p>\n

\n

He is the slime at the bottom of every fountain. Irretrievably, there has been Nisard. How can we love benches, knowing that Nisard often pressed them into service? Gently stroking a cat\u2019s silken fur, my hand inevitably reproduces a gesture once made by Nisard . . . Did Nisard ever make one move that we might want to follow or imitate? Did he ever incarnate anything other than the tedium of being D\u00e9sir\u00e9 Nisard, definitively, forever and ever?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Like the allergens and vermin to which he\u2019s often compared, Nisard invades the book. His name appears in a series of contemporary newspaper columns quoted by the narrator. In these columns, Nisard morphs into a drunk driver, a shoplifter, a tennis player bested by Rafael Nadal at the Davis Cup, a defender of the war in Iraq, a politician promoting austerity, the captain of an errant oil rig . . . comic exaggeration, yes, but it\u2019s also Chevillard showing the ways that Nisard\u2019s brand of conservatism lives on. A former student\u2019s memoir informs us that, while head of the \u00c9cole Normale, Nisard promoted the notion of the \u201ctwo moralities,\u201d a stricter code for the lower classes and a more permissive code for the elites, an idea that would not seem out of place in U.S. political culture today.<\/p>\n

In quiet moments, the narrator dreams of a book without Nisard (\u201cthe reader would be first of all amazed by the light\u201d) but his thoughts are always half-formed and tentative. The paradox is funny: there can be no radical without tradition. Eventually the narrator concludes:<\/p>\n

\n

In order to finally read the book without Nisard\u2014possible only in a world without Nisard\u2014we must first pass through this book chock-full of Nisard, depending on that overabundance to arouse the purgative reflex that will at long last expel Nisard from this world forever.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This gets at Chevillard\u2019s double project, which is both a demolition and an exhumation. The animus driving the narrator is at times quite close to an obsessive love (\u201cFor three weeks I thought of nothing but his thighs\u201d). As he scours research libraries for A Milkmaid Succumbs<\/em> and ventures closer to Nisard\u2019s hometown, he begins to fear his own \u201cNisardification.\u201d This strange intimacy between writer and critic comes to the fore toward the end of the book. \u201cWhat did I ever do to him,\u201d the narrator wonders, \u201cthat he should assail me so relentlessly!\u201d<\/p>\n

For my part, I\u2019m convinced. Nisard is out there somewhere, working on his column on the death of the novel. But Eric Chevillard has struck a blow against him on our behalf. This slim and delightful book casts doubt on Nisard\u2019s theory that literature has been in irreversible decline since the end of the eighteenth century. In fact, Demolishing Nisard<\/em> feels very twenty-first century, and it\u2019s everything Nisard is not: original, imaginative, wild, and a lot of fun. <\/p>\n

\n<\/a>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As with years past, we’re going to spend the next three weeks highlighting the rest of the 25 titles on the BTBA fiction longlist. We’ll have a variety of guests writing these posts, all of which are centered around the question of “Why This Book Should Win.” Hopefully these are funny, accidental, entertaining, and informative […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":292,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[67476],"tags":[45686,45656,17496,45976,45986,45996,3426,10086],"class_list":["post-289646","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-best-translated-book-awards","tag-25-days-of-the-btba","tag-btba-2012","tag-dalkey-archive-press","tag-demolishing-nisard","tag-eric-chevillard","tag-eric-lundgren","tag-french-literature","tag-jordan-stump"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/289646","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/292"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=289646"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/289646\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":334266,"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/289646\/revisions\/334266"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=289646"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=289646"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=289646"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}