Last week, Chad, Brian, special guest Patrick Smith, and an insightful YouTube commentator discussed part IV of Georgi Gospodinov\u2019s<\/i> The Physics of Sorrow. This section, in many ways, brought us full circle to the nature of Gospodinov\u2019s work by introducing us to the cultural phenomena of the time capsule, and the circumstances that drive people to bury stuff they like in the ground. Through this investigation, Gospodinov sheds light into what this book is about and what he accomplishes with the short, broken pieces that make it up.<\/i><\/p>\n
Mazes and Spirals<\/b><\/p>\n
Through these last couple of weeks, through all the wonderful guests and discussions and through the beautifully prose of The Physics of Sorrow<\/em>, we\u2019ve had the pleasure of unravelling a dark and complex piece. From the second week and onward it feels like each conversation ends with someone saying something along the lines of \u201cwe\u2019re returning to so much\u201d and \u201cwe\u2019re getting deeper into this.\u201d<\/p>\n As much as Gospodinov and his work are involved in the labyrinth as a historic and emotional metaphor, the spiral finds a place in understanding both the work and our discussion of it as readers. I will elaborate on this as the post winds on.<\/p>\n The Core of the Spiral<\/b><\/p>\n The first section of the Two Month Review, which included the Epigraphy, Prologue, and \u201cThe Bread of Sorrow,\u201d set up the themes that Gospodinov revisits in the subsequent sections\u2014this thought something I\u2019ve already written in previous blog posts. These recurring elements include abandonment, the minotaur, the labyrinth, life in communist Bulgaria, the mythic, fathers, darkness, basements, and the like. Obviously, well-crafted books do this: build and return to themes. But Gospodinov treats his themes like he treats his family, and his imagination: he treats them like characters that are born, develop, and are perpetually at risk of losing everything and dying. These themes are more a part of the cast and less an abstraction that is built by the behavior of his human characters\u2014not excluding Asterius with my use of \u201chuman.\u201d<\/p>\n The second section, \u201cAgainst an Abandonment: The Case of M,\u201d presented us with public defender Gospodinov and his defense for the minotaur. This section developed our understanding of Gospodinov\u2019s obsession with myth, particular the rich history and his own speculations on the myth of the Minotaur and its relationship to his own family and upbringing.<\/p>\n The third section, \u201cThe Yellow House,\u201d returned us to stories of Gospodinov and his family in Bulgaria, and, again, routed us through the themes and characters established in the previous two sections. It is important to note that beyond this coiling of each section, Gospodinov adds more events, and friends, and family members but does so, frequently, through the established themes.<\/p>\n This fourth section, \u201cTime Bomb (To be Opened After the End of the World),\u201d has Gospodinov laying his plans bare and creates a confluence between the content of the book, the themes, characters, places, and discussions, with the form that Gospodinov has created, the short and somewhat related pieces within larger sections. We see, again, the themes at play with people and moments in his life. He returns us to his grandfather, introduces us to a school-aged, rebelliously insightful Gospodinov, shows us more facets to his stylistic abilities, and all around the intense discussion of time capsules. And as he works his way from time capsules on fridges, or time capsules launched into space, or buried into the ground, and as he spirals again around the elements that are important to The Physics of Sorrow<\/em> it starts to become clear that, put simply, this book is a time capsule.<\/p>\n Along the Loops<\/b><\/p>\n This week\u2019s section opens with \u201cThe Aging of an Empath\u201d where Gospodinov discusses the eventual loss of his ability to embed, a side effect of aging, and, I\u2019d add, an overexposure to humanity. Most importantly, he describes that his habit of hoarding objects is an attempt to counteract the loss of his Obsessive Empathetic-Somatic Syndrome, or \u201cradical empathetic-somatic syndrome\u201d as he (mis)remembers.<\/p>\n And this isn\u2019t the first time that Gospodinov has described collecting objects, but this provides further insight into why he does. Collecting starts in \u201cFirst Aid Kit for After the End of the World,\u201d which lushly describes a young version of himself slowly preparing a kit, of sorts, to survive a nuclear attack, with goods and kind words included. And this pattern of collecting repeats.<\/p>\n He writes about how he hoards apocalypse-inspired headlines, mentions Mengele\u2019s personal journals, the disks that the Voyager<\/em> and Pioneer<\/em> spacecrafts carried to give extraterrestrial life a glimpse into the glory of mankind via a recording of Jimmy Carter\u2019s voice. He also writes about time capsules throughout the world, and a need to map the location of all of them, the need for a literary time capsule of all genres and trends, and the possible dangers of future humanoids stumbling upon our time capsules.<\/p>\n These acts of collecting are rooted in fear, from Gospodinov\u2019s survival kit to NASA\u2019s strange experiment, and are attempts to ameliorate said fears. Beautifully, this section\u2014this entire work, rather, is engaging in this process. Through \u201cFirst Aid Kit[. . .],\u201d in the light of Gospodinov losing his embedding, we see him fracture his older self from his younger self, writing on his younger self as distinct person\u2014almost writing as though there is a death that has separated these two individuals. And in response to this fear of further loss, Gospodinov has taken to collect and preserve moments. He collects newspaper headlines and discusses massive beehive death, and birds dropping from the sky. And even the popularity of time capsules mirrors fears of nuclear annihilation or apocalypse by another means. The time capsule ameliorates our fears as even if we are wiped from the face of the the earth, the collection of materials sustains our existence deep beneath the earth, or in space, or on the page.<\/p>\n That said, we can read all books as being time capsules of sorts\u2014these obscure collections of thoughts and images that contain an interpretation of a past time for a future time\u2014sure. But from the exchange between Chad, Brian, and Patrick, I\u2019m convinced to separate The Physics of Sorrow<\/em> from the over encompassing speculation of \u201cbooks are time capsules\u201d to the more accurate \u201cThe Physics of Sorrow by Georgi Gospodinov is a time capsule.\u201d This idea was set up beautifully by a comment from Patrick, when he said, paraphrased, \u201cthe brokenness of the form is built for destruction.\u201d Chad followed up by adding that missing a section\u2014I\u2019d argue referring to either the larger section of the books or the smaller units within each section\u2014is ok (obviously read the whole thing, it\u2019s good). The Physics of Sorrow<\/em> is this greater vessel of smaller fragments, all related in some way yet distinct enough on their own, and\u2014better yet\u2014crafted with this comprehension of a bleak, possibly apocalyptic, future.<\/p>\n The Pioneer<\/em> and Voyager<\/em> disks contained fragments of mankind at a certain temporal locus, just as the Westinghouse Time Capsules, and the time capsule from the young Gospodinov\u2019s school in Pleven. And The Physics of Sorrow<\/em> is doing just what these time capsules are. Each fragment of each section standing on it\u2019s own with its own commentary with its relationship to the characters and themes. The themes are sustained not by just one piece, but by many, just as the many characters come and go through the sections. Hypothetically, should the capsule crack, and most of the contents be destroyed (should you rip out a chunk of the book), the individual fragments elaborate on another so often, that missing one doesn\u2019t destroy a reader\u2019s ability to understand what Gospodinov accomplishes throughout the whole of The Physics of Sorrow<\/em>. The minotaurs, the labyrinth, Bulgaria, Communism, abandonment, World War\u2014all these elements repeat and deepen from fragment to fragment to create a sustained understanding of the book itself considering the threat of mass destruction.<\/p>\n Gospodinov\u2019s Arc<\/b><\/p>\n This confluence of form and content that I\u2019ve been speaking to is the most blunt with the paired sections of \u201cNoah Complex\u201d and \u201cNew Realism.\u201d \u201cNoah Complex\u201d suggests that a encyclopedic time capsule of writing should be created including:<\/p>\n [. . .] monologue through Socratic dialogue to epos in hexameter, from fairytales through treatises to lists. From high antiquity to slaughterhouse instructions. Everything can be gathered up and transported in such a book.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n <\/p>\n This would contain writing from all times, and different styles and authors. And after all his tongue-in-cheek commentary on time capsules, each entry dripping with a quiet criticism of the futility, he writes in this section:<\/p>\n Only the book is eternal, only its covers shall rise above the waves, only the beasts inside, between its pages swarming with life, will survive. And when they see the new land, they will go forth and multiply [. . .] And what is written shall be made flesh and blood and shall be brought to life in all its perfection. And \u201cthe lion\u201d shall become a lion, \u201cthe horse\u201d will whinny like a horse, \u201cthe crow\u201d will fly from the page with an ugly croak . . . And the Minotaur will come out into the light of day.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n <\/p>\n Adopting a sort of mystic prose, he places his faith in the book to be a suitable vessel for realities, relying on the readers imagination\u2014a proxy for his own experienced embedding\u2014to bring the worlds contained in this Noachian encyclopedia to life (as corny as it sounds), to change the animals, in quotes, into animals in flesh. I even feel a nod to his own work as he imagines the Minotaur out in the light.<\/p>\n Gospodinov gives us just that in this following section \u201cNew Realism,\u201d where he drops us into a beautifully written realist narrative. Defined as \u201ca faithful representation of reality\u201d or \u201cverisimilitude,\u201d this section speaks to just that, as Gospodinov shifts styles yet again to make a point. I don\u2019t even really know where to draw from to give the \u201cbest\u201d example of his writing\u2014the whole narrative speaks to that. It\u2019s important to note that many of the authors from his Epigraphy were realists in their national literatures, and, relatedly the epigraphs from Flaubert and St. Augustine speak to the ability to embed and being able to suspend the fleeting moment as so that it may be experienced, at the very least, a second time.<\/p>\n This is the moment of union for this work, as a whole, between its form and content. Gospodinov, considering a singular death at one end and apocalypse at the other, collects a series of fragments to hopefully survive and be reopened. With his wit, he might even fear what the results may be, as we see in \u201cFuture Number 73,\u201d where future humanoids find his Communist Youth Brigade inductee letter create a yearly bloodletting. I must say, I\u2019m curious what a society of people who worship the \u2018doctrine\u2019 of \u201cNew Realism\u201d would accomplish.<\/p>\n And Back Again Through the Spiral<\/b><\/p>\n This confluence of form and content, while emphasized in this section has been going on the entire time and I believe we can assume it will continue. Obviously, we can look at each section as these collections of ephemera, something to understand Bulgarian history following the death of the 2015 version of Georgi Gospodinov, but, specifically, there are sections throughout the book that mirror his time capsule form.<\/p>\n In the Prologue we saw that collection of entities, all seemingly alone if not interrelated by their isolation. In \u201cThe Bread of Sorrow\u201d sections like \u201cTrophy Words,\u201d which documented the Hungarian words that his grandfather kept through national shifts and relocations, \u201cCrumbling Language\u201d and \u201cG,\u201d which both highlighted Gospodinov\u2019s own adventures with language acquisition, and \u201cA Short Catalogue of Abandonments,\u201d which listed cases of abandonment from various myths around the world.<\/p>\n \u201cAgainst an Abandonment: The Case of M\u201d had the \u201cDossier\u201d and \u201cMyth and Game,\u201d which were lengthy collections of (mis)representations of the Minotaur, while \u201cChild-Unfriendly\u201d and \u201cDevoured Children in Greek Mythology (An Incomplete Catalogue)\u201d both list injustices against children, in and out of myth.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Yellow House\u201d featured a series of these catalogs, from \u201cA Catalogue of Collections,\u201d to \u201cFrom a Catalogue of Important Erotic Scenes\u201d to the various collections of accounts from the 1980s.<\/p>\n But this most recent section brings all these to the surface and discusses them head-on. And this is where I return to the spiral. A participant in the chat from last week\u2019s podcast, one gabbiano117, wrote:<\/p>\n This really is the perfect book for reading and rereading again and again. The way it retreats and advances and circles and gets lost in itself again and again and again.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n <\/p>\n Gospodinov is writing something that coils upon itself, but also builds. He started the piece by explaining how his world works, and from that point provided examples that affirm his construction. And as we go onto the next section, I\u2019m excited to see how else the spiral will progress, and how what form the Minotaur takes in another place and time.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Last week, Chad, Brian, special guest Patrick Smith, and an insightful YouTube commentator discussed part IV of Georgi Gospodinov\u2019s The Physics of Sorrow. This section, in many ways, brought us full circle to the nature of Gospodinov\u2019s work by introducing us to the cultural phenomena of the time capsule, and the circumstances that drive people […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":36,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[67426],"tags":[32966,66206,6476,36716,59366,1646,67206,60856,66196],"class_list":["post-307956","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-two-month-review","tag-angela-rodel","tag-brian-wood","tag-chad-post","tag-georgi-gospodinov","tag-patrick-smith","tag-review","tag-santiago-morrice","tag-the-physics-of-sorrow","tag-two-month-review"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307956","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/36"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=307956"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307956\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":331446,"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307956\/revisions\/331446"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=307956"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=307956"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rochester.edu\/College\/translation\/threepercent\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=307956"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}