University of Rochester
NEWS AND FACTS

Skip Navigation Bar
Winter-Spring 2001
Vol. 63, No. 2-3

Review home

Archives


Departments

Letters to the Editor

President's Page

Rochester in Review

Alumni Review

Alumni Gazette

Class Notes

Books & Recordings

After/Words

Back cover

Alumni Association announcements

[NEWS AND FACTS BANNER]
Phone BookContact the UniversitySearch/Index
News and Facts
Rochester Review--University of Rochester magazine

Features Next Story
Previous Story

Reveling in Contradictions

Nobel laureate Steven Chu '70

The academic field of quantum optics is more than 100 years old, and even Nobel Prize winners are still having trouble sorting out the implications.

A subject that revels in seeming contradictions-light is both discrete photon and continuous wave; two atoms sharing a quantum state become the same atom -often forces logically minded scientists into seemingly illogical conclusions.

When it was first proposed, the quantum theory "made no sense to anyone who thought about it in any rational way," admitted Nobel laureate Steven Chu '70 during a presentation in Strong Auditorium. "Physicists would have loved for it to go away."

"We hate this theory," he added. "The only thing it has going for it is that it seems to be true."

Chu, a professor of physics at Stanford University, is one of the most highly regarded specialists engaged in deciphering the quirky, subatomic boundary where light and matter interact.

Joined on stage by University optics professor Ian Walmsley and physics professor Nick Bigelow, Chu outlined some of the work for which he won the 1997 Nobel Prize in physics.

Using focused laser light, Chu proved that the motion of atoms could be brought to a near standstill, effectively cooling the atoms to a fraction of a degree above absolute zero. Such atoms are trapped in what Chu calls "optical molasses."

This technical breakthrough has resulted in some unforeseen but important applications. In particular, the work has contributed to the development of hyper-accurate clocks that lose only fractions of a second over many millions of years. That, in turn, makes other measurements more accurate.

"The measurement of time is the stake in the ground for all other measurements," he said.

Maintained by University Public Relations
Please send your comments and suggestions to:
Rochester Review.

Contact the UniversityPhonebookSearch/IndexBack to Home [RUSH RHEES LIBRARY IMAGE]
©Copyright 1999 — 2002 University of Rochester