Skip to content
Society & Culture

The secret to happiness? Feeling loved

Two psychologists—one a happiness researcher and the other a relationship expert—say love isn’t found. It’s created, one mindset at a time.

Book cover art for "How to Feel Loved" by Harry Reis and Sonja Lyubomirsky shows the title words in a cutout of a paper heart folded down the middle. Once Sonja Lyubomirsky, a distinguished psychology professor at the University of California, Riverside, was asked on live TV what the secret to happiness was.

“It’s ridiculous, it’s reductive, and it’s restrictive,” the happiness researcher recalls thinking. Worse, she didn’t have an answer she really believed in.

That changed when Sonja met Harry.

Harry Reis, a professor of psychology at the University of Rochester and the Dean’s Professor in Arts and Sciences, has studied social connections and close relationships for many years. When Lyubomirsky told him the TV anecdote, Reis didn’t offer a pat answer. Instead, he shared an observation: “I do know people who are happy, and I know people who are unhappy, and I can tell you the main difference between them: Happy people feel loved.”

That single sentence became the jumping-off point for their book, How to Feel Loved: The Five Mindsets That Get You More of What Matters Most (Harper, 2026), which blends decades of research on happiness and human connection. Its thesis is both comforting and confrontational: If you don’t feel loved, you might be looking in the wrong direction.

Do we know how to feel loved?

Reis draws a distinction that many miss. People often focus their lives on being loved, but what’s more important, he says, is feeling loved. The difference matters. “Many of us are actually loved by other people, and yet we don’t feel it,” says Reis, who has spent the last five decades studying how close and romantic relationships work.

It isn’t that people have lost the capacity to recognize love or the absence of it. The problem, he argues, lies in the strategies people use to try to generate that feeling.

“Many people believe that in order to feel love, they need to make themselves more lovable,” Reis says—by becoming more impressive, more attractive, more successful. While these strategies can be effective in the short term, they’re more likely to create distance in the long term. The feeling people are after, he says, doesn’t come from polishing the surface. Instead, the way to feel more loved is to build a loving connection with another person.

Harry Reis with his arms crossed and reflected in the side of Meliora Hall.
ALL YOU NEED IS LOVE? When people feel loved, Harry Reis says, “they’re happier and healthier. They’re more productive. They’re more successful in what they do.” (University of Rochester photo / J. Adam Fenster)

The ‘relationship sea-saw’

To explain how connection works, Reis and Lyubomirsky use what they call the “relationship sea-saw.” The spelling with its water allusion is intentional. The idea is that in our connections with others, it can seem as if we’re sitting on a see-saw with part of us submerged under water—hidden.

“When we lift up the other person, it’s as if we lift them above the waterline,” Reis explains. “All of a sudden, parts that were previously hidden are now visible.” That act of paying attention and showing care creates momentum, which in turn encourages the other person to lift us up and above the imaginary water level.

In short, the way to begin to feel more love is to show more love to the other person, setting off a cycle of mutual responsiveness.

Illustration about how to feel loved showing two see-saws, each with two hearts on them and submerged under water. The see-saw on the left is completely balanced with the tops of the hearts above water. The see-saw on the right shows one side tipped down and the other tipped up.
NOW YOU SEE ME: The “relationship sea-saw,” a water-based metaphor devised by the researchers to illustrate how couples can build a loving connection with each other.

Five mindsets, not five steps

The book organizes that cycle into five mindsets—not a checklist, but a way of approaching interaction. “It’s not like, okay, the next two minutes I’ll do mindset number one,” Reis says. “It’s a mentality.”

The Sharing Mindset means letting others see the real you—honestly, but not all at once, not indiscriminately, and certainly not by oversharing. Meanwhile, both the Listening-to-Learn and Radical Curiosity Mindsets shift the focus outward. Too often, Reis says, people listen with the goal of simply responding. What works better is true curiosity to find out what makes the other person tick.

That curiosity relies on the Open-Heart Mindset—genuine concern for another person’s well-being—and the Multiplicity Mindset, which asks for a non-judgmental approach in the face of complexity. One person is rarely all good or all selfish.

“All of us have strengths,” Reis notes, “and all of us have embarrassing moments and weaknesses.” Seeing others and ourselves as multifaceted, he argues, makes love more resilient.

Attention in an age of screens

All these ways of building connection depend on something increasingly scarce—undivided attention. Even small distractions can erode it. In one study, simply having your cell phone—untouched—on the table made conversations less fulfilling.

Why? “We’re always looking to see what signal comes through,” Reis explains. Even a glance can communicate absence. “When I see your eyes glance down at your phone, I feel you’re not 100 percent involved.” The effect is magnified online, where people often multitask during Zoom conversations. “You can tell,” Reis says, and the connection immediately thins.

Can AI make us feel loved?

As artificial intelligence becomes ubiquitous and more conversational, some are turning to chatbots for connection. Reis understands the appeal. “Many people rely on chatbots to fulfill their need for connection,” he says. These chatbots are remarkably good at it, trained to express empathy and understanding.

Chatbot interactions are frequently one-sided. Real relationships, by contrast, require reciprocity.

But Reis draws a firm boundary. “The problem is that chatbots can’t really love.” An AI bot doesn’t genuinely care about anything other than carrying out its program.

To explain why that matters, Reis turns to biology. “If you’re really hungry and you have a candy bar, that will satiate your hunger for a time,” he says. “Will it provide nutrition? Provide long-term well-being? No.” Chatbots, he argues, can offer short-term relief without the ingredients for long-term sustenance.

They also remove friction, which can become a human problem. Chatbot interactions are frequently one-sided. “You can do all the opening up,” Reis says, “and the chatbot will do all the empathic responding.” Real relationships, by contrast, require reciprocity—and discomfort. Real-life partners complain and make demands on you. Those human moments, Reis argues, are not flaws. Instead, they provide the seeds for relationships to grow.

The choice that matters

What ultimately separates human love from its digital imitation is choice. What makes human love such a powerful experience, according to Reis, is the recognition that the other person is choosing to love us.

And, when people feel loved, Reis says, “they’re happier and healthier. They’re more productive. They’re more successful in what they do.”