Please consider downloading the latest version of Internet Explorer
to experience this site as intended.
Tools Search Main Menu

What will it take to restore the economy after COVID-19?

June 19, 2020
Bar graph against world map.COVID-19 "operates as a drag on the economy,” says University of Rochester economics professor and former Federal Reserve bank president Narayana Kocherlakota. “The better we do on public health, the better the economy will do.” (Getty Images photo)
Narayana Kocherlakota, the Lionel W. McKenzie Professor of Economics at Rochester, offers his view on economic recovery during a pandemic.

Unemployment in the United States is between 13 and 14 percent—the highest rates we’ve seen since the 1930s. The stock market swings up and down in part based on how optimistic global investors are that the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic is behind us.

Narayana Kocherlakota, the Lionel W. McKenzie Professor of Economics at the University of Rochester and a former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, drives home a simple point about the prospects for economic recovery: it will depend on how effectively we can combat COVID-19.

Rochester Restart

Find the latest information on the University’s COVID-19 restart and recovery efforts.

COVID-19 symptoms or exposure?

Find out what to do if you or a close contact have symptoms or think you may have been exposed.

“If people are worried about the disease, they’re less likely to get a haircut or go to a restaurant. So the disease operates as a drag on the economy,” he says. “The better we do on public health, the better the economy will do.”

What’s the best-case scenario for recovery?

The best-case scenario is one where, for whatever reason, the virus ceases to be a major factor in our lives by the second half of the year. That can happen in a number of different ways. The virus can mutate, researchers can come up with a treatment that can be delivered quickly, or—because of our public health interventions through testing, tracing, and quarantining (TTQ)—we’re able to get on top of COVID-19 to the extent that people feel confident that there aren’t that many cases any more. If any of that happened, then we can expect a very fast recovery in the second half of the year.

In lieu of an effective national TTQ program, what would you expect in terms of an economic recovery?

The Federal Reserve expects that unemployment will drop to a little below 10 percent by the end of this year, and not reach the five percent range until the end of 2022. Growth would be slow, while unemployment remains high. That’s what I would call the modal—or most likely—outlook, given that we have a patchwork of approaches around the country—and around the world—to COVID-19.

Is there a third outlook?

The worst case is much worse. In the state of New York, we’ve seen a tremendous decline in cases, which comes from serious restrictions on people’s behavior and actions. We’re hoping that the TTQ program will be sufficiently robust so that we won’t have to go back to those restrictions.

In the worst-case scenario, governments are unable to get on top of the disease, resulting in wave after wave of new cases. Then we’d be stuck at near 10 percent unemployment for a very long time.

How important are stimulus plans if the recession lingers?

If the virus remains a threat, then stimulus will be critical. If people are not working, we need the government to provide money for them to continue making purchases. Without those stimulus payments, demand will falter and unemployment will stay high.

Right now, the political dialogue is moving against more fiscal interventions. We had robust interventions by the federal government in March and April, most of which were designed to expire over the course of the summer. Given the political dialogue and my assessment of national public health policy, I really worry about what the economy will look like in the fall.

Tags: , , , ,

Category: Society & Culture

Contact Author(s)